Data-Engineer-Associate Antworten, Data-Engineer-Associate Prüfungsvorbereitung
Die Schulungsunterlagen zur Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Zertifizierungsprüfung von ITZert sind die besten Schulungsunterlagen zur Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Zertifizierungsprüfung. Sie sind die besten Schulungsunterlagen unter allen Schulungsunterlagen. Sie können Ihnen nicht nur helfen, die Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Prüfung erfolgreich zu bestehen, Ihre Fachkenntnisse und Fertigkeiten zu verbessern und auch eine Karriere zu machen. Sie werden von allen Ländern gleich behandelt.
Sorgen Sie noch darum, dass Sie die Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Zertifizierungsprüfung nicht bestehen können? Dann sollen Sie sich an ITZert wenden. Wir können Sie die Top-Fähigkeit in der IT-Branche mitbringen, mit der Sie dieAmazon Data-Engineer-Associate Prüfung mühlos bestehen. Nach langjährigen Bemühungen beträgt die Bestehensrate bereits 100%. Wählen Sie ITZert, dann wählen Sie einen Weg zur glänzenden Zukunft.
>> Data-Engineer-Associate Antworten <<
Data-Engineer-Associate Aktuelle Prüfung - Data-Engineer-Associate Prüfungsguide & Data-Engineer-Associate Praxisprüfung
Sind Sie IT-Fachmann? Wollen Sie Erfolg? Dann kaufen Sie die Schulungsunterlagen zur Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Zertifizierungsprüfung von ITZert. Sie werden von der Praxis prüft. Sie werden Ihnen helfen, die Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Zertifizierungsprüfung zu bestehen. Ihre Berufsaussichten werden sich sicher verbessern. Sie werden ein hohes Gehalt beziehen. Sie können eine Karriere in der internationalen Gesellschaft machen. Wenn Sie spitze technischen Fähigkeiten haben, sollen Sie sich keine Sorgen machen. Die Schulungsunterlagen zur Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Zertifizierungsprüfung von ITZert werden Ihren Traum verwirklichen. Wir werden mit Ihnen durch dick und dünn gehen und die Herausforderung mit Ihnen zusammen nehmen.
Amazon AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) Data-Engineer-Associate Prüfungsfragen mit Lösungen (Q63-Q68):
63. Frage
A company has three subsidiaries. Each subsidiary uses a different data warehousing solution. The first subsidiary hosts its data warehouse in Amazon Redshift. The second subsidiary uses Teradata Vantage on AWS. The third subsidiary uses Google BigQuery.
The company wants to aggregate all the data into a central Amazon S3 data lake. The company wants to use Apache Iceberg as the table format.
A data engineer needs to build a new pipeline to connect to all the data sources, run transformations by using each source engine, join the data, and write the data to Iceberg.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational effort?
Antwort: B
Begründung:
Amazon Athena provides federated query connectors that allow querying multiple data sources, such as Amazon Redshift, Teradata, and Google BigQuery, without needing to extract the data from the original source. This solution is optimal because it offers the least operational effort by avoiding complex data movement and transformation processes.
Amazon Athena Federated Queries:
Athena's federated queries allow direct querying of data stored across multiple sources, including Amazon Redshift, Teradata, and BigQuery. With Athena's support for Apache Iceberg, the company can easily run a Merge operation on the Iceberg table.
The solution reduces complexity by centralizing the query execution and transformation process in Athena using SQL queries.
Reference:
Alternatives Considered:
A (AWS Glue pipeline): This would work but requires more operational effort to manage and transform the data in AWS Glue.
C (Amazon EMR): Using EMR and writing PySpark code introduces more operational overhead and complexity compared to a SQL-based solution in Athena.
D (Amazon AppFlow): AppFlow is more suitable for transferring data between services but is not as efficient for transformations and joins as Athena federated queries.
Amazon Athena Documentation
Federated Queries in Amazon Athena
64. Frage
A security company stores IoT data that is in JSON format in an Amazon S3 bucket. The data structure can change when the company upgrades the IoT devices. The company wants to create a data catalog that includes the IoT data. The company's analytics department will use the data catalog to index the data.
Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
Antwort: A
Begründung:
The best solution to meet the requirements of creating a data catalog that includes the IoT data, and allowing the analytics department to index the data, most cost-effectively, is to create an Amazon Athena workgroup, explore the data that is in Amazon S3 by using Apache Spark through Athena, and provide the Athena workgroup schema and tables to the analytics department.
Amazon Athena is a serverless, interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data directly in Amazon S3 using standard SQL or Python1. Amazon Athena also supports Apache Spark, an open-source distributed processing framework that can run large-scale data analytics applications across clusters of servers2. You can use Athena to run Spark code on data in Amazon S3 without having to set up, manage, or scale any infrastructure. You can also use Athena to create and manage external tables that point to your data in Amazon S3, and store them in an external data catalog, such as AWS Glue Data Catalog, Amazon Athena Data Catalog, or your own Apache Hive metastore3. You can create Athena workgroups to separate query execution and resource allocation based on different criteria, such as users, teams, or applications4. You can share the schemas and tables in your Athena workgroup with other users or applications, such as Amazon QuickSight, for data visualization and analysis5.
Using Athena and Spark to create a data catalog and explore the IoT data in Amazon S3 is the most cost-effective solution, as you pay only for the queries you run or the compute you use, and you pay nothing when the service is idle1. You also save on the operational overhead and complexity of managing data warehouse infrastructure, as Athena and Spark are serverless and scalable. You can also benefit from the flexibility and performance of Athena and Spark, as they support various data formats, including JSON, and can handle schema changes and complex queries efficiently.
Option A is not the best solution, as creating an AWS Glue Data Catalog, configuring an AWS Glue Schema Registry, creating a new AWS Glue workload to orchestrate theingestion of the data that the analytics department will use into Amazon Redshift Serverless, would incur more costs and complexity than using Athena and Spark. AWS Glue Data Catalog is a persistent metadata store that contains table definitions, job definitions, and other control information to help you manage your AWS Glue components6. AWS Glue Schema Registry is a service that allows you to centrally store and manage the schemas of your streaming data in AWS Glue Data Catalog7. AWS Glue is a serverless data integration service that makes it easy to prepare, clean, enrich, and move data between data stores8. Amazon Redshift Serverless is a feature of Amazon Redshift, a fully managed data warehouse service, that allows you to run and scale analytics without having to manage data warehouse infrastructure9. While these services are powerful and useful for many data engineering scenarios, they are not necessary or cost-effective for creating a data catalog and indexing the IoT data in Amazon S3. AWS Glue Data Catalog and Schema Registry charge you based on the number of objects stored and the number of requests made67. AWS Glue charges you based on the compute time and the data processed by your ETL jobs8. Amazon Redshift Serverless charges you based on the amount of data scanned by your queries and the compute time used by your workloads9. These costs can add up quickly, especially if you have large volumes of IoT data and frequent schema changes. Moreover, using AWS Glue and Amazon Redshift Serverless would introduce additional latency and complexity, as you would have to ingest the data from Amazon S3 to Amazon Redshift Serverless, and then query it from there, instead of querying it directly from Amazon S3 using Athena and Spark.
Option B is not the best solution, as creating an Amazon Redshift provisioned cluster, creating an Amazon Redshift Spectrum database for the analytics department to explore the data that is in Amazon S3, and creating Redshift stored procedures to load the data into Amazon Redshift, would incur more costs and complexity than using Athena and Spark. Amazon Redshift provisioned clusters are clusters that you create and manage by specifying the number and type of nodes, and the amount of storage and compute capacity10. Amazon Redshift Spectrum is a feature of Amazon Redshift that allows you to query and join data across your data warehouse and your data lake using standard SQL11. Redshift stored procedures are SQL statements that you can define and store in Amazon Redshift, and then call them by using the CALL command12. While these features are powerful and useful for many data warehousing scenarios, they are not necessary or cost-effective for creating a data catalog and indexing the IoT data in Amazon S3. Amazon Redshift provisioned clusters charge you based on the node type, the number of nodes, and the duration of the cluster10. Amazon Redshift Spectrum charges you based on the amount of data scanned by your queries11. These costs can add up quickly, especially if you have large volumes of IoT data and frequent schema changes. Moreover, using Amazon Redshift provisioned clusters and Spectrum would introduce additional latency and complexity, as you would have to provision andmanage the cluster, create an external schema and database for the data in Amazon S3, and load the data into the cluster using stored procedures, instead of querying it directly from Amazon S3 using Athena and Spark.
Option D is not the best solution, as creating an AWS Glue Data Catalog, configuring an AWS Glue Schema Registry, creating AWS Lambda user defined functions (UDFs) by using the Amazon Redshift Data API, and creating an AWS Step Functions job to orchestrate the ingestion of the data that the analytics department will use into Amazon Redshift Serverless, would incur more costs and complexity than using Athena and Spark. AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that lets you run code without provisioning or managing servers13. AWS Lambda UDFs are Lambda functions that you can invoke from within an Amazon Redshift query. Amazon Redshift Data API is a service that allows you to run SQL statements on Amazon Redshift clusters using HTTP requests, without needing a persistent connection. AWS Step Functions is a service that lets you coordinate multiple AWS services into serverless workflows. While these services are powerful and useful for many data engineering scenarios, they are not necessary or cost-effective for creating a data catalog and indexing the IoT data in Amazon S3. AWS Glue Data Catalog and Schema Registry charge you based on the number of objects stored and the number of requests made67. AWS Lambda charges you based on the number of requests and the duration of your functions13. Amazon Redshift Serverless charges you based on the amount of data scanned by your queries and the compute time used by your workloads9. AWS Step Functions charges you based on the number of state transitions in your workflows. These costs can add up quickly, especially if you have large volumes of IoT data and frequent schema changes. Moreover, using AWS Glue, AWS Lambda, Amazon Redshift Data API, and AWS Step Functions would introduce additional latency and complexity, as you would have to create and invoke Lambda functions to ingest the data from Amazon S3 to Amazon Redshift Serverless using the Data API, and coordinate the ingestion process using Step Functions, instead of querying it directly from Amazon S3 using Athena and Spark. References:
What is Amazon Athena?
Apache Spark on Amazon Athena
Creating tables, updating the schema, and adding new partitions in the Data Catalog from AWS Glue ETL jobs Managing Athena workgroups Using Amazon QuickSight to visualize data in Amazon Athena AWS Glue Data Catalog AWS Glue Schema Registry What is AWS Glue?
Amazon Redshift Serverless
Amazon Redshift provisioned clusters
Querying external data using Amazon Redshift Spectrum
Using stored procedures in Amazon Redshift
What is AWS Lambda?
[Creating and using AWS Lambda UDFs]
[Using the Amazon Redshift Data API]
[What is AWS Step Functions?]
AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide
65. Frage
A data engineer uses Amazon Redshift to run resource-intensive analytics processes once every month. Every month, the data engineer creates a new Redshift provisioned cluster. The data engineer deletes the Redshift provisioned cluster after the analytics processes are complete every month. Before the data engineer deletes the cluster each month, the data engineer unloads backup data from the cluster to an Amazon S3 bucket.
The data engineer needs a solution to run the monthly analytics processes that does not require the data engineer to manage the infrastructure manually.
Which solution will meet these requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?
Antwort: D
Begründung:
Amazon Redshift Serverless is a new feature of Amazon Redshift that enables you to run SQL queries on data in Amazon S3 without provisioning or managing any clusters. You can use Amazon Redshift Serverless to automatically process the analytics workload, as it scales up and down the compute resources based on the query demand, and charges you only for the resources consumed. This solution will meet the requirements with the least operational overhead, as it does not require the data engineer to create, delete, pause, or resume any Redshift clusters, or to manage any infrastructure manually. You can use the Amazon Redshift Data API to run queries from the AWS CLI, AWS SDK, or AWS Lambda functions12.
The other options are not optimal for the following reasons:
* A. Use Amazon Step Functions to pause the Redshift cluster when the analytics processes are complete and to resume the cluster to run new processes every month. This option is not recommended, as it would still require the data engineer to create and delete a new Redshift provisioned cluster every month, which can incur additional costs and time. Moreover, this option would require the data engineer to use Amazon Step Functions to orchestrate the workflow of pausing and resuming the cluster, which can add complexity and overhead.
* C. Use the AWS CLI to automatically process the analytics workload. This option is vague and does not specify how the AWS CLI is used to process the analytics workload. The AWS CLI can be used to run queries on data in Amazon S3 using Amazon Redshift Serverless, Amazon Athena, or Amazon EMR, but each of these services has different features and benefits. Moreover, this option does not address the requirement of not managing the infrastructure manually, as the data engineer may still need to provision and configure some resources, such as Amazon EMR clusters or Amazon Athena workgroups.
* D. Use AWS CloudFormation templates to automatically process the analytics workload. This option is also vague and does not specify how AWS CloudFormation templates are used to process the analytics workload. AWS CloudFormation is a service that lets you model and provision AWS resources using templates. You can use AWS CloudFormation templates to create and delete a Redshift provisioned cluster every month, or to create and configure other AWS resources, such as Amazon EMR, Amazon Athena, or Amazon Redshift Serverless. However, this option does not address the requirement of not managing the infrastructure manually, as the data engineer may still need to write and maintain the AWS CloudFormation templates, and to monitor the status and performance of the resources.
References:
* 1: Amazon Redshift Serverless
* 2: Amazon Redshift Data API
* : Amazon Step Functions
* : AWS CLI
* : AWS CloudFormation
66. Frage
A company uses Amazon S3 to store semi-structured data in a transactional data lake. Some of the data files are small, but other data files are tens of terabytes.
A data engineer must perform a change data capture (CDC) operation to identify changed data from the data source. The data source sends a full snapshot as a JSON file every day and ingests the changed data into the data lake.
Which solution will capture the changed data MOST cost-effectively?
Antwort: B
Begründung:
An open source data lake format, such as Apache Parquet, Apache ORC, or Delta Lake, is a cost-effective way to perform a change data capture (CDC) operation on semi-structured data stored in Amazon S3. An open source data lake format allows you to query data directly from S3 using standard SQL, without the need to move or copy data to another service. An open source data lake format also supports schema evolution, meaning it can handle changes in the data structure over time. An open source data lake format also supports upserts, meaning it can insert new data and update existing data in the same operation, using a merge command. This way, you can efficiently capture the changes from the data source and apply them to the S3 data lake, without duplicating or losing any data.
The other options are not as cost-effective as using an open source data lake format, as they involve additional steps or costs. Option A requires you to create and maintain an AWS Lambda function, which can be complex and error-prone. AWS Lambda also has some limits on the execution time, memory, and concurrency, which can affect the performance and reliability of the CDC operation. Option B and D require you to ingest the data into a relational database service, such as Amazon RDS or Amazon Aurora, which can be expensive and unnecessary for semi-structured data. AWS Database Migration Service (AWS DMS) can write the changed data to the data lake, but it also charges you for the data replication and transfer. Additionally, AWS DMS does not support JSON as a source data type, so you would need to convert the data to a supported format before using AWS DMS. References:
* What is a data lake?
* Choosing a data format for your data lake
* Using the MERGE INTO command in Delta Lake
* [AWS Lambda quotas]
* [AWS Database Migration Service quotas]
67. Frage
A data engineer is building an automated extract, transform, and load (ETL) ingestion pipeline by using AWS Glue. The pipeline ingests compressed files that are in an Amazon S3 bucket. The ingestion pipeline must support incremental data processing.
Which AWS Glue feature should the data engineer use to meet this requirement?
Antwort: B
Begründung:
Problem Analysis:
The pipeline processes compressed files in S3 and must support incremental data processing.
AWS Glue features must facilitate tracking progress to avoid reprocessing the same data.
Key Considerations:
Incremental data processing requires tracking which files or partitions have already been processed.
The solution must be automated and efficient for large-scale ETL jobs.
Solution Analysis:
Option A: Workflows
Workflows organize and orchestrate multiple Glue jobs but do not track progress for incremental data processing.
Option B: Triggers
Triggers initiate Glue jobs based on a schedule or events but do not track which data has been processed.
Option C: Job Bookmarks
Job bookmarks track the state of the data that has been processed, enabling incremental processing.
Automatically skip files or partitions that were previously processed in Glue jobs.
Option D: Classifiers
Classifiers determine the schema of incoming data but do not handle incremental processing.
Final Recommendation:
Job bookmarks are specifically designed to enable incremental data processing in AWS Glue ETL pipelines.
Reference:
AWS Glue Job Bookmarks Documentation
AWS Glue ETL Features
68. Frage
......
ITZert ist eine Website, die Bequemlichkeiten für die Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Zertifizierungsprüfung bietet. Nach den Forschungen über die Fragen und Antworten in den letzten Jahren kann ITZert die Themen zur Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Zertifizierungsprüfung effektiv erfassen. Die Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Prüfungsübungen haben eine große Ähnlichkeit mit realen Prüfungen.
Data-Engineer-Associate Prüfungsvorbereitung: https://www.itzert.com/Data-Engineer-Associate_valid-braindumps.html
Wenn Sie den Test bestehen wollen, wird Data-Engineer-Associate braindumps PDF den Kandidaten helfen, die Prüfung erfolgreich zu bestehen, Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Antworten Aber sie verwenden viel Zeit auf die Schulungskurse, Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Antworten Mit ihr können Sie ein ganz anderes Leben führen, Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Antworten Wir helfen Ihnen sehr gerne, Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Antworten Per unsere guten Schulungsunterlagen von guter Qualität können Sie sicher die Prüfung bestehen und eine glänzende Zukunft haben.
Schickt einen Raben, Am Nachmittag geht Josi in den Bären zu Binia, Wenn Sie den Test bestehen wollen, wird Data-Engineer-Associate braindumps PDF den Kandidaten helfen, die Prüfung erfolgreich zu bestehen.
Kostenlose AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) vce dumps & neueste Data-Engineer-Associate examcollection Dumps
Aber sie verwenden viel Zeit auf die Schulungskurse, Data-Engineer-Associate Mit ihr können Sie ein ganz anderes Leben führen, Wir helfen Ihnen sehr gerne, Per unsere guten Schulungsunterlagen von guter Data-Engineer-Associate Prüfungsfragen Qualität können Sie sicher die Prüfung bestehen und eine glänzende Zukunft haben.